The Fair Housing Act
Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you've safely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive details only on official, safe and secure websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as property managers and realty companies as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance companies whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to individuals since of:
race or color.
religion.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of individuals raises a concern of public value. Where force or threat of force is used to reject or disrupt fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act also offers procedures for dealing with individual grievances of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have been victims of an unlawful housing practice, might file a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based upon referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to disguise their discrimination by providing false details about schedule of housing, either stating that absolutely nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to particular areas based on race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases alleging this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this sort of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have also declared that towns and other city government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they rejected authorizations or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to primarily minority communities, since the potential locals were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination in housing based upon faith. This prohibition covers circumstances of obvious discrimination versus members of a specific faith as well less direct actions, such as zoning regulations developed to limit making use of personal homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases submitted given that 1968 alleging spiritual discrimination is small in comparison to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a minimal exception that enables non-commercial housing run by a religious company to reserve such housing to persons of the same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In the last few years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with restricted housing options, often have little recourse however to endure the embarrassment and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or danger having their households and themselves removed from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on property owners who create an illogical living environment by requiring sexual favors from renters or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to acquire relief for tenants who have been treated unjustly by a landlord since of sex and also prevent other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning may also negatively affect women, especially minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his or her forefathers originated. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action against community governments that have actually tried to reduce or limit the number of Hispanic families that may live in their neighborhoods. We have actually taken legal action against lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more strict underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually also taken legal action against lenders for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This includes brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have done something about it against personal property owners who have actually victimized such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus families with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act likewise avoids housing service providers from imposing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of kids. For example, landlords might not find households with children in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the total number of persons who may reside in a home, or limit their access to leisure services provided to other tenants. In the majority of instances, the modified Fair Housing Act forbids a housing provider from declining to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some centers may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the standards set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released policies and extra assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of impairment in all types of housing deals. The Act specifies persons with a disability to suggest those people with mental or physical impairments that significantly limit one or more significant life activities. The term mental or physical impairment may include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, chronic fatigue, discovering disability, head injury, and mental health problem. The term significant life activity might include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise safeguards persons who have a record of such a problems, or are considered having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited controlled compounds, individuals convicted for unlawful manufacture or circulation of a controlled substance, sex transgressors, and juvenile offenders are not thought about handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no defenses to individuals with or without impairments who present a direct risk to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct danger must be made on an individualized basis, however, and can not be based on basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for individuals with impairments has actually focused on two significant locations. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations concerning land use are not used to impede the property options of these people, including needlessly limiting communal, or gather, residential plans, such as group homes. The 2nd area is insuring that recently built multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with specials needs, and, in particular, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination against people with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some people with disabilities might cohabit in congregate living plans, typically described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits towns and other city government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or executing land usage policies that omit or otherwise victimize people with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land usage policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with specials needs less positively than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be a regulation restricting housing for persons with specials needs or a particular kind of special needs, such as mental disorder, from locating in a particular location, while permitting other groups of unassociated individuals to live together in that area.
- To do something about it versus, or deny a permit, for a home since of the disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building authorization for a home due to the fact that it was meant to offer housing for individuals with psychological retardation.
- To decline to clear up lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such accommodations may be required to manage individuals or groups of individuals with disabilities an equivalent opportunity to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes a sensible lodging is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If an asked for adjustment enforces an excessive monetary or administrative concern on a local government, or if a modification produces an essential alteration in a city government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "sensible" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus individuals with impairments to include a failure "to design and construct" certain brand-new multi-family homes so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with specials needs, and particularly people who use wheelchairs. The Act needs all newly constructed multi-family houses of four or more systems planned for first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have certain functions: an available entryway on an available route, available common and public use areas, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each residence, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in available place, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can steer about the space.
Developers, contractors, owners, and designers accountable for the style or construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held accountable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to fulfill these style requirements. The Department of Justice has brought lots of enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have actually been fixed by authorization decrees providing a range of types of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring unattainable functions into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- options (financial funds or other building requirements) that will supply for making other housing units available; training on the accessibility requirements for those associated with the construction procedure; a required that all new housing projects comply with the availability requirements, and financial relief for those injured by the offenses. In addition, the Department has sought to promote accessibility through structure codes.
